PETITIONED FOR BY
BRENT GLASS, SCOTT HUMMEL AND OTHERS
The
Board of County Commissioners of Putnam
County, Ohio, met in regular session on the 22nd day of April, 2010, at the office of said Board
with the following members present: Mr.
John E. Love and Mr. Travis A. Jerwers.
Mr.
Jerwers moved the adoption of
the following Resolution:
WHEREAS, This 22nd day of April, 2010, the Clerk of this Board gave notice to
the Board of County Commissioners of
Putnam County, Ohio, on the filing with her of a petition signed by Brent Glass
and Scott Hummel and others, to locate
and construct a waterway.
and
WHEREAS, It appears to the Board that the proper bond has
been filed with the Clerk, approved, conditioned for the payment of costs of
notices, plus any other incidental expenses, except the costs incurred by the
Engineer in making his preliminary reports, if the prayer of the petition is
not granted, or if the petition is for any cause dismissed, unless the Board
decides to pay the Engineer's costs from the bond in accordance with Section
6131.09 of the Ohio Revised Code.
now
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, By the Board of County
Commissioners that the 27th day of May, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. at the upper
terminus of the improvement be and the same is hereby fixed as the time and
place for the view thereon;
and
be it further
RESOLVED,
That the 10th day of June, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. in the General Assembly Room
of the Putnam County Court House, Ottawa, Ohio, be and the same is hereby fixed
as the time and place for the first hearing on the petition.
and
be it further
RESOLVED, That notice of said view and
hearing be given, as required by law.
and be it further
RESOLVED,
It is found and determined that all formal actions of this Board concerning
and relating to the adoption of the Resolution were adopted in an open meeting
of this Board, and that all deliberations of this Board and of any of its
Committees that resulted in such formal action were in meetings open to the
public in compliance with all legal requirements including Section 121.22 of
the Ohio Revised Code.
Mr. Love seconded the motion and the roll being
called upon its adoption, the vote resulted as follows: Mr. Jerwers yes Mr. Love yes
Mr. Schroeder absent