RESOLUTION-COMMISSIONERS FINDING AFFIRMING FORMER ORDER,

CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING THE LETTING OF THE CONTRACTS

 

 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE                                                        OCT. 2, 2008

SINGLE COUNTY DITCH #926

PETITIONED FOR BY

SYLVESTER LIEBRECHT, JR.

 

 

The Board of  County Commissioners of Putnam County, Ohio, met in regular session on the 2nd day of  October, 2008, in the Assembly Room of the Putnam County Court House with the following members present:  Mr. John E. Love, Mr. Vincent T. Schroeder and Mr. Robert A. Riepenhoff.

 

            Mr.  Riepenhoff  moved the adoption of the following Resolution:

 

            WHEREAS, On the 2nd day of October, 2008, the final hearing on the reports, plans and schedules of the County Engineer on the estimated assessments, on claims for compensation or damages and on the proceedings for the improvement, and on application filed for change of route or change in the nature, kind and extent of the work proposed to be done;      

and

 

            WHEREAS, The Board finds that due and legal notice of this final hearing has been given as required by law;

and

 

            WHEREAS, The Board has heard all the evidence offered in the proceedings and received and considered all the schedules, plans and reports filed by the County Engineer; 

now therefore, be it

 

            RESOLVED, That the Board review and reconsider its former order made and dated the 11th day of  October, 2007, in favor of said improvement.                                   

and

 

WHEREAS, This Board has considered the cost of location and construction, the compensation for land taken, the damages to land along or in the vicinity of the route of the improvement, the damages to land below the lower terminus of the improvement which may be caused by constructing the improvement, the sufficiency of the outlet, the benefits to the public welfare, and the special benefits to land needing the improvement, etc;                    

and be it further

 

RESOLVED, That said former order finding in favor of said improvement made at the first hearing on the 11th day of  October, 2007, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

and  be it further                                                                  

 

RESOLVED, That two years shall be the period of time, in semi-annual installments, as taxes are paid, given the owners of land benefited; to pay the assessments that may be made for the improvement;

and be it further

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final Hearing

Syl. Liebrecht Jr.  Ditch #926….page 2

 

 

            RESOLVED, That the 6th  day of November, 2008,  at 1:15  p.m. be and

 the same is  hereby fixed as the time for letting the contract for the construction of

the proposed improvement, and that the County Engineer be and he is hereby directed

to let the contracts for the construction of the proposed improvement;                                 

and be it further

 

RESOLVED, That the County Engineer be and he is hereby directed to give at least two weeks notice as required by law of the time when and the place where bids will be received for furnishing any material for the improvement, or for the construction of the improvement, or any part hereof, and in case manufactured material is required for the construction of the improvement the County Engineer is hereby directed to send copies of the notice by mail to dealers and manufacturers, and all bids shall be received in the office of the Clerk of the County Commissioners.                  

and be it further

 

RESOLVED, It is found and determined that all formal actions of this Board concerning and relating to the adoption of the Resolution were adopted in an open meeting of this Board, and that all deliberations of this Board and of any of its Committees that resulted in such formal action were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements including Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.

 

 Mr. Love  seconded the motion and the roll being called upon its adoption, the vote resulted as follows: Mr. Riepenhoff yes     Mr. Schroeder no    Mr. Love yes