RESOLUTION – DISMISSAL OF DITCH

 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE

SINGLE COUNTY WATERWAY #951

PETITIONED BY BRENT GLASS

 

 

            The Board of County Commissioners of Putnam County, Ohio, met in regular session on the 10th day of June, 2010, in the Assembly Room of the Putnam County Court House with the following members present: Mr. John E. Love and Mr. Vincent T. Schroeder.

 

            Mr.  Schroeder   moved the adoption of the following Resolution:

 

            WHEREAS,  This date, the  Board of County Commissioners conducted the first hearing on the above named improvement, by causing the petition to be publicly read;                                                         

and

                                                                                                                                 

            WHEREAS, During the hearing, one of the petitioners, Duane Vorst advised  he had an agreement signed by  landowners to improve the drainage project privately.

and

 

            WHEREAS, Also during the hearing, the Board of County Commissioners received a letter signed by petitioners Brent Glass and Scott Hummel requesting to withdraw the petition.

now therefore, be it

 

 RESOLVED,  The Board of County Commissioners, upon the request of the petitioners, Brent Glass and Scott Hummel, does hereby dismiss said ditch petition.

and be it further

 

            RESOLVED, That all costs of the proceedings in said matter be and the same are hereby ordered to be paid by the persons who signed the bond namely, Brent Glass and Scott Hummel.

and be it further

 

 RESOLVED, It is found and determined that all formal actions of this Board concerning and relating to the adoption of the Resolution were adopted in an open meeting of this Board, and that all deliberations of this Board and of any of its Committees that resulted in such formal action were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements including Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.

 

            Mr. Love    seconded the motion and the roll being called upon its adoption, the vote resulted as follows:  Mr. Jerwers absent;   Mr. Schroeder yes    Mr. Love yes